Winning Chess Tactics, revised (Winning Chess - Everyman Chess) 赢得国际象棋战术，订正（赢得国际象棋-国际象棋e veryman）

Customer Review: Too complicated for beginners, poor teaching, no repetition, low explanations = bad book on tactics 客户检讨：太复杂，对于初学者，穷人的教学，没有重复，低的解释=坏书的战术
There are many problems with this book, and it’sa shame because the book has many 4- and 5-star reviews that will most likely overshadow this one.有很多问题是与这本书，这是耻辱，因为这本书有很多4 -和5星级评论认为，将最有可能掩盖了这一点。 Nonetheless, I feel compelled to write a review on this book.不过，我觉得写一检讨，这本书。

1. 1 。 The tests in this book have several major problems.测试在这本书有几个重大的问题。 Usually there are 4-6 tests for each tactic.通常有4-6测试，为每个策略。 The first two questions are usually on par with the examples, or slightly harder.头两个问题，通常看齐，与例子，或稍微困难。 Then the questions drastically get tougher.那么，问题得到大幅强硬。 Like one reviewer pointed out… one question will require a simple 2-move combination, and the next requires you to figure out the 100% perfect move-list for a 10-move checkmate.想一查察指出， …一问题将需要一个简单的2 -动议的组合，和未来需要您计算出百分之一百完美的动议名单为10动议死。 Sorry, I’m not a grandmaster Yassir!对不起，我不是一个grandmaster亚西尔！ The problem is that the tests don’t progressively get tougher.问题是，测试不逐步得到强硬。 There are usually more tougher tests than easy ones too, which I think only demoralizes the reader when they realize that they can’t figure more than 30% of them out.通常有更多更严格的测试，比那些过于容易，我认为只有demoralizes读者当他们认识到，他们不能数字的百分之三十以上出来。

2. 2 。 Sometimes the first question is actually one of the toughest!有时第一个问题是，其实最困难的！ This is rare, and it happens!这是罕见的，它发生！ Great method of instruction!伟大的教学方法！ (sarcasm). （讽刺） 。 Another problem is that none of the examples are challenging, but Yassir expects the reader to use the vague general principle taught and exercise it to master-level strength in the tests.另一个问题是，没有一个例子是具有挑战性的，但亚西尔预计读者使用含糊不清的一般原则，教导和行使它掌握级别的实力，在测试。 It’s like the questions were purposefully tougher than the examples, and I don’t understand the reason.它的一样的问题，有针对性地强硬比的例子，我不明白原因。

3. 3 。 There are not enough easy tests to cement the pattern of the tactic in the reader’s mind.有没有足够的容易测试，以水泥格局的手法，在读者的心灵。 In fact, there is often only 1 test of each pattern for the tactic being demonstrated.其实，还有常常只有1测试每个模式的策略被证明。 As we know, pattern recognition only happens with constant repetition, so the book is more or less useless on this front.正如我们所知，模式识别，只有不断发生重复，所以这本书是更多或更少没用在这方面。 Maybe the problems in “Chess Tactics for Students” were simpler, but at least I can recognize those tactics rather quickly at a glance.也许问题在“国际象棋战术学生”简单，但至少我可以承认这些战术，而不是迅速，一目了然。 This book hasn’t helped me at all in my games.这本书并没有帮助我在所有在我的游戏。

4. 4 。 Sometimes tests at the beginning also use tactics taught in later chapters.有时测试，在开始时也使用战术教授在之后的章节。 For example, there’sa clearance sacrifice required to solve a problem in one of the first tests… but clearance sacrifice taught several chapters later.举例来说，有关的牺牲，必须解决一个问题，在第一个考验… …但关牺牲教几章稍后。

5. 5 。 Sometimes the answers to the tests are wrong.有时答案测试是错误的。 On test 23, you are put in check by the opponent’s queen and you have to decide how to get out of check.在测试23 ，你是把在检查对方的皇后大道中和，你必须决定如何摆脱检查。 You can block with your queen, block with a pawn or move the king (it’sa pin problem… so the goal is to avoid a pin).您可以阻止与您的皇后，同座的马前卒，或移动国王（这是针的问题…所以，目标是要避免一个PIN ） 。 After looking at the position however, I immediately saw that ‘e5′ (blocking with the pawn) was the best solution.看完的立场，不过，我立即看到' e5 ' （拦截与棋子）是最好的解决方法。 It does pin the pawn to the King, but if you look at the position, it’s not a negative at all.但这针该棋子，向国王，但如果你看看的地位，它不是一个消极的所有。

However, Yassir says moving the King is the best answer… and doesn’t even consider blocking with the pawn at all!然而，亚西尔说，移动国王是最好的答案… …并没有阻止，甚至考虑与棋子，在所有！ He just ignored the possibility completely.他只是忽略了完全的可能性。 After giving the position to Fritz and Rybka chess engines, both said ‘e5′ was the best solution.后给予的立场，以弗里茨和雷布卡国际象棋引擎，无论是说' e5 '是最好的解决方法。 Moving the King was only second best.移动国王只有降格以求。

There are several other tests (even those 8-10 move complex ones!) where the lines suggested by Yassir are incorrect, or where other solutions could easily fit the bill as the ‘correct’ answer.有几个其他的测试（甚至那些8月10日动议复杂的！ ）凡线的建议，亚西尔是不正确，或在其他解决办法，很可能合适的条例草案，作为'正确'的答案。 Test 50 is a good example of this.测试50是一个很好的例子。 Honestly, myself, Fritz and Yassir only agreed on the first 2 moves.老实说，我自己，弗里茨和亚西尔只同意就第一项第2举动。 At that point, Yassir was dreaming of this 8-move checkmate that doesn’t exist.在这一点上，亚西尔梦想，这8动议死即不存在。 When asking Fritz and Rybka the answer, it goes on for much longer with completely different moves.当问弗里茨和雷布卡的答案，这是不言而喻就为长得多，与完全不同的动作。

As far as I can tell, this only serves to demoralize the reader like they are doing something wrong.据我可以告诉，这只是士气的读者一样，他们这种做法是错误的。 The tests should have been worked out so that very few lines would work.测试应该已经出来，使极少数线会的工作。 As it stands, your answer is almost always going to be different than Yassir’s answer for these long 10-move problems.因为它的立场，您的答案是几乎总是要有所不同，比亚西尔的答案为这些长期10动议的问题。

6. 6 。 There are spelling and grammar mistakes throughout the book, even in the revised edition.有拼写和语法错误，在整个这本书，甚至在修订版。

7. 7 。 Explanations are usually very thin.解释通常是非常薄的。 Sometimes the author will say “and with these 4 moves, Black is in real big trouble!”有时候作者会说： “和与这4个动作，黑色是在真正的大麻烦” ！

The problem is that Yassir doesn’t explain how he’s in trouble (it’s usually some kind of tactic that is unrelated to the concept that is being taught).问题是，亚西尔没有解释他如何的在闹事（它的通常是一些种策略，这是无关的概念，这是教授） 。 Yassir should have explained everything so that it was understood by new and expert players alike, but he doesn’t!亚西尔应已解释一切，使人们理解，新和专家的球员一样，但他不！ This happens quite frequently in the book, where the reader is left to their own devices to see what the author means.这种情况相当频繁在这本书中，读者那里是留给他们自己的设备，看看有什么作者的手段。 It just interrupts with the flow and understanding.它只是中断与流动和理解。

8. 8 。 The example games at the back of the book are irrelevant.为例，游戏的背后，这本书是无关宏旨。 The games with Anderssen are completely pointless.游戏与anderssen是完全无谓。 Yes, the games feature tactics, but it’s only because the opponent accepted gambits (because it’s “the manly thing to do!”) and accepted double-rook sacrifices (because “he wants his opponent to prove a point”) without considering the compensation that the other player gets or actually formulating plans of his own.是的，游戏功能的策略，但它的，只是因为对方接受gambits （因为它的“男子汉的事！ ” ）和接受双车的牺牲， （因为“他希望他的对手，以证明这一点” ）而不考虑补偿其他玩家获得或实际制定规划自己的。

In effect, Anderssen’s opponents were idiots… and by modern standards, nobody in their right mind would play the way either player would.在效果， anderssen的对手白痴… …并以现代的标准，没有人在他们的权利介意将发挥的方式不是每个球员都会。 In fact, they would get crushed.事实上，他们会得到了毁灭性打击。 What is the point of analyzing inferior openings and inferior moves when today’s games will never see them?什么是点分析劣势挖掘和劣势的举动时，今天的游戏将再也看不到他们？ We learn by osmosis.我们学习的渗透。 These are not the type of games we should be studying!这些都不是类型的游戏，我们应该学习！

9. 9 。 Also, the examples are master-level games where 90% of the stuff is not explained.此外，例子是硕士级游戏如90 ％的东西是没有解释。 Honestly, much of it went over my head.坦白说，大部分是前往我的脑袋。 I don’t understand the point to learning from master-level games.我不明白这点，以学习掌握级别的游戏。 Why not show some 1200-1500 level games instead?为什么不显示，一些1200年至1500年的水平而不是游戏呢？ Like show really common tactics we will see on a regular basis… and common errors and how they can be exploited?像显示，真正的共同策略，我们将看到一个定期的基础上… …和常见的错误，以及他们如何可以利用呢？ Why not make this book practical?为什么不使这本书的实际呢？ This approach would have made the game analysis useful.这种做法会作出的博弈分析有用的。

10. 10 。 There needs to be more diagrams in the book.有需要更多的图在这本书中。 Many times Yassir will throw out move lists or entire games with one or two diagrams.很多次，亚西尔将抛出动议名单，或整个游戏与一个或两个图表。 Unless you have a chess set with you, you are sitting at a computer, or you can see all the moves in your head… these examples won’t be of much benefit to you.除非你有一个国际象棋与你，你是坐在电脑前，或者您可以看到所有的动作在你的头上…这些例子，将没有多大好处给你。 They are just hard to follow, and makes it impossible to read on… say… a bus.他们只是努力遵循，并使其无法读取就… …说，一辆巴士。 This is a problem with many chess books, and I don’t know why they couldn’t add another 40 pages to the book to make it easier to read.这是一个问题，与许多国际象棋的书籍，我不知道他们为什么不能添加另一个40页，以这本书，以使其更易于阅读。 I would have gladly paid the extra .50 cents.我会很乐意支付额外的0.50美分。

11. 11 。 The book is also plagued with the problem where you have a diagram on one page, and it’s explanation on another… causing the reader to flip back and forth.这本书，也是困扰与问题，如果你有一个图表在同一页上，它的解释，在另一…造成读者倒装回到来回。 Was it really hard to paginate the examples properly, even if it meant having some white space?是真的很难paginate的例子，妥善，即使这意味着有一些白色的空间？

Make no mistake, I did learn things from this book.不要搞错，我也了解的东西，这本书。 I think because so many examples did use clearance sacrifices or piece sacrifices that I can see them a little better… perhaps because the “I’m going to lose on the exchange” mentality has been changed.我认为，因为有很多的例子，没有使用手续的牺牲，或一块牺牲，我可以看到他们一点更好…也许是因为“我要去失去了对外汇”的心态已经改变。 Still, the book is just poor instruction and there has to be better books on tactics out there than this one.还有，这本书只是穷人的指示和必须有更好的书籍，战术有比这1 。
Customer Review: It’s All Here… 客户审查：这一切都在这里…
If you want a good book on tactics, this is the one for the Class A player on down.如果您想要一本好书的战术，这是一个为A级的球员。 There are two kinds of books on tactics; ones that are a collection of tactical problems categorized by theme and this kind which is instructional and contains just the amount of problems needed to get the point made.有两种，一种图书的策略;那些是一个收集的战术问题归类为主题，这种是教学和只包含的数额问题，需要获取所提出的一点。 This book also has a great exam at the end to rate your skill level at tactics and see how much of the book you have absorbed.这本书也有一个伟大的考试结束率你的技能水平和战术见有多少本书你有吸收。 Couple this book with Reinfeld’s Winning Chess or Combinational Challenge by Hays(for the more advanced player) and you don’t need any more on the subject!夫妇这本书与赖因费尔德的赢得国际象棋或组合的挑战，海斯（为更先进的播放器）和您不需要任何更多的关于这一主题的！

Tags: chess guide , learn chess , chess tactics , chess book标签： 国际象棋为指导 ， 学习国际象棋 ， 国际象棋的战术 ， 棋书