Endgame Tactics: A Comprehensive Guide to the Sunny Side of Chess Endgames Why is it that most amateur chess players love opening and middlegame tactics but hate endgames? endgame策略：全面引导到有阳光的一面象棋endgames是为什么大多数业余国际象棋选手爱情的开幕和middlegame战术，但仇恨endgames ？ Why do you usually look at only a couple of pages in any endgame theory book you see?为什么你通常看，只有一对夫妇的网页在任何endgame理论书籍你看呢？ Sit back, forget about theoretical endgames, and enjoy the entertainment of real life chess in Endgame Tactics!坐在回，忘记了理论endgames ，并享受娱乐的现实生活中国际象棋在endgame战术！ There is no substitute for hard work in getting better at chess, as a wise grandmaster once said.是不可替代的辛勤工作，在变得更好，在国际象棋，作为一个明智的grandmaster曾经说过。 But you always work harder at something you enjoy.但你总是努力工作在一些你喜欢。 Make the first step towards improving your endgame play (and beat more opponents) by learning to love the endgame.作出的第一步，改善您的endgame发挥（和更多的对手击败）学习爱endgame 。 Endgames are fun, and the examples from everyday practice in Endgame Tactics prove it. endgames是好玩，和日常生活的例子，从实践中endgame战术证明这一点。
Customer Review: Great job 客户修改：伟大的工作
Select positions is not a easy task.选择的职位是不是一个容易的任务。 Van Perlo`s book accomplish his goal with endgames positions separated by themes make more easy and fun study this important phase of chess game.范perlo '书，完成他的目标与endgames职位分离的主题，作出更容易和有趣的学习这一重要阶段的棋局。 Computer revision make sure that all positions are correct in technical point of view.电脑修订，确保所有的立场是正确的，在技术的角度来看。 Still isn`t easy study endgames but surely more fun!仍然isn '吨容易研究endgames ，但肯定更好玩！
Customer Review: A good book could have been better. 客户修改：一本好书可以得到更好的。
This book got the English chess federation’s book of the year award.这本书得到了英语国际象棋联合会的书，年度奖。 This book is not an exhaustive manual but focuses on endgames that occur frequently in practice.这本书是不是一个详尽的手册，但侧重于endgames认为，频频发生，在实践中。 The positions chosen are entertaining and educational; the positions were checked using Fritz, a strong computer chess program; that’s the good part about the book.位置选择的娱乐和教育;立场，并检查了使用弗里茨，一个强大的电脑象棋程式;的良好的一部分，关于此书。 Unfortunately, the positions with 6 pieces or less were not checked with tablebases which play endgames *perfectly*.不幸的是，立场与6件或以下的人不进行检查与tablebases发挥endgames *完全*. For example, diagram 287 on page 135 gives white’s move 1 b6?例如，图287页， 135给人白色的举动一B6的？ as an error.作为一个错误。 This is not true.这是不正确的。 The win is still there until 4 Kb3?比赛仍然存在，直到4 kb3 ？ which should be drawn but then black plays 4…Rh3+?这应当制定，但当时的黑色扮演4条… … rh3 + ？ handing the win back to white.处理赢回白。 The final position is still a white win which the book claims is a theoretical draw.最后的立场仍然是一个白色赢得其中预订索赔是一个理论借鉴。 Perlo says “I refer you to the manuals”. perlo说： “我是指你手册” 。 He should have said “I refer you to the tablebases”.他应该说： “我是指你向tablebases ” 。 If the editor Peter Boel had taken this one last step the book could have been even better.如果编辑彼得中欧已采取此一最后一步，这本书可能已得更加美好。

Tags: learn chess , chess guide , chess tactics , chess book标签： 学习国际象棋 ， 国际象棋指导 ， 国际象棋的战术 ， 棋书